The Centre is all set to bring in changes to the Income Tax Rules, 1962 by accompanied a transgender range to the Permanent Account Number (PAN) application form.
The Ministry of Finance on April 9 released a Gazette notification announcing that the Central Board of Direct Taxes was correcting the Income Tax Rules to include a transgender category in Forms 49A and 49AA. Best lawyer in Punjab…
This amendment comes four years after the discretion of the Supreme Court in the case of National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India & Ors, which gave recognizance to the third gender.
The Supreme Court is also capture of a petition seeking a transgender category in the PAN card request form.
The petition, filed by transgender social activist Reshma Prasad, scramble that as a transgender person, her gesticulation to link her PAN with Aadhaar failed many times since unlike Aadhaar, the PAN card did not specify any transgender fluctuation.
Prasad’s petition states,
“It supervene that the online/offline systems of the Income Tax Department, resistance the judgment passed in the National Legal Services Authority Vs. Union of India & Ors 2014 does not recognize third gender as a distinct gender. It is humbly submitted that even the consumption for PAN does not have a extraordinary option of ‘third gender’. PAN cards/numbers to date are being issued with gender as male or female only.”
As a result, the petitioner was incapable to file income tax returns as a transgender person. A petition filed in the Patna High Court seeking tantamount relief was dismissed by the Patna High Court, prompting Prasad to accessibility the Supreme Court.
Prasad was characterize in the Supreme Court by Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) advocate Nabila Hasan. The Court has also postulate the assistance of the Attorney General KK Venugopal in the case.
When the matter came up for listening on March 28, Chief Justice Dipak Misra directed that a copy of the petition be served to the Attorney General, and catalogued the matter after eight weeks.
More Info: – Supreme Court judgement